<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A note about sound quality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/a-note-about-sound-quality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com</link>
	<description>The Standard In Live Release Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:56:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BootBoySlim</title>
		<link>http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/a-note-about-sound-quality/comment-page-1/#comment-7861</link>
		<dc:creator>BootBoySlim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 17:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/a-note-about-sound-quality/#comment-7861</guid>
		<description>For that matter the review itself is also subjective, maybe more so, depending on said reviewers personal feelings for an artist/band in general. Sound quality is a technical evaluation (or, should be), and not an emotional one. Considering that, perhaps a sound quality rating would carry a less subjective bias than the review itself, and thereby must be considered an important aspect of any complete review. Speaking for myself, even if a release is of a favorite band, and even a great performance, if the sound quality is poor, then, the release becomes more a curiosity, and one time listen, and does not even deserve a place in my collection. On the other hand, if a completist, then, sound quality or any review makes no difference. However, when RoIO&#039;s are at the price levels of today, then, I would like to have as much input as possible before making a purchase, and sound quality certainly plays an important role, even if not thee most important, and even if subjective to a degree, just like the entire review. I say the more info &amp; input the better. Bring on the sound quality ratings!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For that matter the review itself is also subjective, maybe more so, depending on said reviewers personal feelings for an artist/band in general. Sound quality is a technical evaluation (or, should be), and not an emotional one. Considering that, perhaps a sound quality rating would carry a less subjective bias than the review itself, and thereby must be considered an important aspect of any complete review. Speaking for myself, even if a release is of a favorite band, and even a great performance, if the sound quality is poor, then, the release becomes more a curiosity, and one time listen, and does not even deserve a place in my collection. On the other hand, if a completist, then, sound quality or any review makes no difference. However, when RoIO&#8217;s are at the price levels of today, then, I would like to have as much input as possible before making a purchase, and sound quality certainly plays an important role, even if not thee most important, and even if subjective to a degree, just like the entire review. I say the more info &amp; input the better. Bring on the sound quality ratings!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: boom shaka laka</title>
		<link>http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/a-note-about-sound-quality/comment-page-1/#comment-1684</link>
		<dc:creator>boom shaka laka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 16:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/a-note-about-sound-quality/#comment-1684</guid>
		<description>Notwithstanding Gold Disc CD&#039;s or DVD-A, Silvers are optimised for use in professional audio CD recorders, using an ultra-stable Phthalocyanine recording dye to achieve exceptional recording accuracy and a secure archival life of 100 years.

Orange Book specifications are exceeded in all areas with the critical Reflection Ratio increased to greater than 74% through the use of a silver reflective layer, resulting in greater compatibility with a wider range of CD recorders and players. (Silvers are pro cdr&#039;s)

That said, so what.  If the original recording that is burned on it is subpar then you still get a subpar sounding Silver, however you will hear subpar more clearly and you will have a subpar recorded Silver for a lifetime.  Obviously the opposite is also true.

Nevertheless, having had both regular CDR&#039;s and Silvers of same shows it is easy to see why COLLECTORS would want the Silver.  

Gold &amp; DVD-A don&#039;t gain you anything w/ boots unless the SQ is 9+ or 10, professional over average SB, and even then it&#039;s a case by case situation.  For nostalgia purposes and lower costs I go for the vinyl more often. However, for boots in the last 2 decades that isn&#039;t much of an option but there have been exceptions for special high end releases like Zep&#039;s O2 show.

Costs for many Silvers are high and quite frankly out of bounds for the medium, but as with anything it&#039;s what the market will bear. I look for sales, trades and even non compressed dwnlds(flac).  

Afterall, it&#039;s a boot for christ sake, made by a particular kind of fan for the enjoyment of similiar fans(the majority of a fan base is out of the loop), so why should it have to costs so much?  Ask the label makers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Notwithstanding Gold Disc CD&#8217;s or DVD-A, Silvers are optimised for use in professional audio CD recorders, using an ultra-stable Phthalocyanine recording dye to achieve exceptional recording accuracy and a secure archival life of 100 years.</p>
<p>Orange Book specifications are exceeded in all areas with the critical Reflection Ratio increased to greater than 74% through the use of a silver reflective layer, resulting in greater compatibility with a wider range of CD recorders and players. (Silvers are pro cdr&#8217;s)</p>
<p>That said, so what.  If the original recording that is burned on it is subpar then you still get a subpar sounding Silver, however you will hear subpar more clearly and you will have a subpar recorded Silver for a lifetime.  Obviously the opposite is also true.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, having had both regular CDR&#8217;s and Silvers of same shows it is easy to see why COLLECTORS would want the Silver.  </p>
<p>Gold &amp; DVD-A don&#8217;t gain you anything w/ boots unless the SQ is 9+ or 10, professional over average SB, and even then it&#8217;s a case by case situation.  For nostalgia purposes and lower costs I go for the vinyl more often. However, for boots in the last 2 decades that isn&#8217;t much of an option but there have been exceptions for special high end releases like Zep&#8217;s O2 show.</p>
<p>Costs for many Silvers are high and quite frankly out of bounds for the medium, but as with anything it&#8217;s what the market will bear. I look for sales, trades and even non compressed dwnlds(flac).  </p>
<p>Afterall, it&#8217;s a boot for christ sake, made by a particular kind of fan for the enjoyment of similiar fans(the majority of a fan base is out of the loop), so why should it have to costs so much?  Ask the label makers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: howard</title>
		<link>http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/a-note-about-sound-quality/comment-page-1/#comment-287</link>
		<dc:creator>howard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 21:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/a-note-about-sound-quality/#comment-287</guid>
		<description>I would like somebody out there to speak on the overwhelming amount of cdrs being sold for rather high prices now. 
I would like to hear opinions on the difference of sound quality regarding silver, and pro cdrs. 
I see alot of titles that are reviewed here that I would like to purchase....
but either I can not find them or they are offered in a cdr format and for the amount of money that they are asking for them is the difference in quality, if there is any worth it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like somebody out there to speak on the overwhelming amount of cdrs being sold for rather high prices now.<br />
I would like to hear opinions on the difference of sound quality regarding silver, and pro cdrs.<br />
I see alot of titles that are reviewed here that I would like to purchase&#8230;.<br />
but either I can not find them or they are offered in a cdr format and for the amount of money that they are asking for them is the difference in quality, if there is any worth it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: walterfive</title>
		<link>http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/a-note-about-sound-quality/comment-page-1/#comment-170</link>
		<dc:creator>walterfive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 20:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/a-note-about-sound-quality/#comment-170</guid>
		<description>...and they are speaking about their specific listening experience on whatever playback equipment and speakers/headphones they are utilizing... some older tapes actually sound better on my car CD player and no low-end speakers than they do on my 100 watt five channel home stereo...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;and they are speaking about their specific listening experience on whatever playback equipment and speakers/headphones they are utilizing&#8230; some older tapes actually sound better on my car CD player and no low-end speakers than they do on my 100 watt five channel home stereo&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.321 seconds -->

