<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brand new Pink Floyd</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/announcements/brand-new-pink-floyd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/announcements/brand-new-pink-floyd/</link>
	<description>The Standard In Live Release Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 09:10:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: gsparaco</title>
		<link>http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/announcements/brand-new-pink-floyd/comment-page-1/#comment-2866</link>
		<dc:creator>gsparaco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 10:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/announcements/brand-new-pink-floyd/#comment-2866</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I need to clarify my thoughts.  &quot;Intersellar Overdrive&quot; was in fact recorded live for &lt;em&gt;Ummagumma&lt;/em&gt; but was never used.  This is not the studio version.  So we can safely say that the track is an &lt;em&gt;Ummagumma&lt;/em&gt; outtake.  According to wikipedia:  &quot;The band had also recorded a live version of &quot;Interstellar Overdrive&quot; (from &lt;em&gt;The Piper at the Gates of Dawn), &lt;/em&gt;intended for placement on side one of the live album. The track was dropped at the last minute, some say to maintain the sound fidelity of the record, but numerous test pressings with the original track list were given to friends of the band, including John Peel.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I need to clarify my thoughts.  &#8220;Intersellar Overdrive&#8221; was in fact recorded live for <em>Ummagumma</em> but was never used.  This is not the studio version.  So we can safely say that the track is an <em>Ummagumma</em> outtake.  According to wikipedia:  &#8220;The band had also recorded a live version of &#8220;Interstellar Overdrive&#8221; (from <em>The Piper at the Gates of Dawn), </em>intended for placement on side one of the live album. The track was dropped at the last minute, some say to maintain the sound fidelity of the record, but numerous test pressings with the original track list were given to friends of the band, including John Peel.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DLee</title>
		<link>http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/announcements/brand-new-pink-floyd/comment-page-1/#comment-2864</link>
		<dc:creator>DLee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 02:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/announcements/brand-new-pink-floyd/#comment-2864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting.  However, &quot;Interstellar Overdrive&quot; is &quot;pulled from the official release for completeness&quot;???  That doesn&#039;t make much sense, and I certainly wouldn&#039;t prefer that to be the case.  If completeness is that important, then why not use an &quot;IO&quot; from another live show from approx. the same period instead of using the official studio recording?  I can see that one piece of artwork (above) actually says &quot;pulled from official release&quot;, which can actually be interpreted 2 different ways - going by that particular choice of words.  Are you sure there isn&#039;t a misinterpretation here?  I ask this especially since I can also see that &quot;IO&quot; is listed as being as long as 13:35 in length, but the version on the official Piper at the Gates of Dawn debut album is actually only 9:41.  Or maybe the extra 3:54 is due to a tune-up in between the tracks?  Either way, it strikes me as rather strange.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting.  However, &#8220;Interstellar Overdrive&#8221; is &#8220;pulled from the official release for completeness&#8221;???  That doesn&#8217;t make much sense, and I certainly wouldn&#8217;t prefer that to be the case.  If completeness is that important, then why not use an &#8220;IO&#8221; from another live show from approx. the same period instead of using the official studio recording?  I can see that one piece of artwork (above) actually says &#8220;pulled from official release&#8221;, which can actually be interpreted 2 different ways &#8211; going by that particular choice of words.  Are you sure there isn&#8217;t a misinterpretation here?  I ask this especially since I can also see that &#8220;IO&#8221; is listed as being as long as 13:35 in length, but the version on the official Piper at the Gates of Dawn debut album is actually only 9:41.  Or maybe the extra 3:54 is due to a tune-up in between the tracks?  Either way, it strikes me as rather strange.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LedMan</title>
		<link>http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/announcements/brand-new-pink-floyd/comment-page-1/#comment-2863</link>
		<dc:creator>LedMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 16:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/announcements/brand-new-pink-floyd/#comment-2863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can&#039;t wait to see and hear this and artwork looks fantastic.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t wait to see and hear this and artwork looks fantastic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
