<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: new releases</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/announcements/new-releases-49/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/announcements/new-releases-49/</link>
	<description>The Standard In Live Release Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 07:12:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: aleebee</title>
		<link>http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/announcements/new-releases-49/comment-page-1/#comment-8497</link>
		<dc:creator>aleebee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 19:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/?p=12129#comment-8497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And having praised Shades for some recent silvers, they issue more on CDR. I simply won&#039;t buy CDRs now, not at all, and I know many of you don&#039;t: is this not reflected in their sales figures?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And having praised Shades for some recent silvers, they issue more on CDR. I simply won&#8217;t buy CDRs now, not at all, and I know many of you don&#8217;t: is this not reflected in their sales figures?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aleebee</title>
		<link>http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/announcements/new-releases-49/comment-page-1/#comment-8494</link>
		<dc:creator>aleebee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 02:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/?p=12129#comment-8494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Exposed In The Light Of Landover (Godfather Records GR396/397) documents the June 9th, 1975 Landover show. Sigma’s Landover 1975 is the following night, June 10th...&quot; OOPS! You&#039;d have thought I&#039;d have checked that most basic of details, would you not! It&#039;s not as if I&#039;m new to this. Thanks for the info.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Exposed In The Light Of Landover (Godfather Records GR396/397) documents the June 9th, 1975 Landover show. Sigma’s Landover 1975 is the following night, June 10th&#8230;&#8221; OOPS! You&#8217;d have thought I&#8217;d have checked that most basic of details, would you not! It&#8217;s not as if I&#8217;m new to this. Thanks for the info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jerrythebarman</title>
		<link>http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/announcements/new-releases-49/comment-page-1/#comment-8491</link>
		<dc:creator>jerrythebarman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 19:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/?p=12129#comment-8491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hmm, just got an update from a supplier who have a Legendary Brussels &#039;73 title, silver, on the &quot;Nanker Nanker&quot; label, catalogue number 003, now listed as a new release. I guess that could be DAC using a pseudonym, as it were.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, just got an update from a supplier who have a Legendary Brussels &#8217;73 title, silver, on the &#8220;Nanker Nanker&#8221; label, catalogue number 003, now listed as a new release. I guess that could be DAC using a pseudonym, as it were.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gsparaco</title>
		<link>http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/announcements/new-releases-49/comment-page-1/#comment-8490</link>
		<dc:creator>gsparaco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 17:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/?p=12129#comment-8490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nope, I&#039;ve not heard about that.  I know that Idol Mind released the Brussels download (which I reviewed), but nothing about DAC releasing Brussels and Hampton.  Hopefully I&#039;ll hear about it soon...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope, I&#8217;ve not heard about that.  I know that Idol Mind released the Brussels download (which I reviewed), but nothing about DAC releasing Brussels and Hampton.  Hopefully I&#8217;ll hear about it soon&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jerrythebarman</title>
		<link>http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/announcements/new-releases-49/comment-page-1/#comment-8489</link>
		<dc:creator>jerrythebarman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 17:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/?p=12129#comment-8489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To address the &quot;where have DAC gone?&#039; question, I was told by a Japanese friend that they just released Brussels and Hampton, the two official downloads, in remixed (?) form though I haven&#039;t seen them listed. You hear anything to that effect, Mr. Sparaco?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To address the &#8220;where have DAC gone?&#8217; question, I was told by a Japanese friend that they just released Brussels and Hampton, the two official downloads, in remixed (?) form though I haven&#8217;t seen them listed. You hear anything to that effect, Mr. Sparaco?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gsparaco</title>
		<link>http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/announcements/new-releases-49/comment-page-1/#comment-8488</link>
		<dc:creator>gsparaco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 01:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/?p=12129#comment-8488</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Exposed In The Light Of Landover (Godfather Records GR396/397) documents the June 9th, 1975 Landover show.  Sigma&#039;s Landover 1975 is the following night, June 10th, and only the first half of the show is in circulation.  I&#039;ll have a full review posted in a couple of days.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exposed In The Light Of Landover (Godfather Records GR396/397) documents the June 9th, 1975 Landover show.  Sigma&#8217;s Landover 1975 is the following night, June 10th, and only the first half of the show is in circulation.  I&#8217;ll have a full review posted in a couple of days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aleebee</title>
		<link>http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/announcements/new-releases-49/comment-page-1/#comment-8487</link>
		<dc:creator>aleebee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 01:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/?p=12129#comment-8487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like DLee, I am puzzled by the Sigma one disc Landover. I presume (well, hope!) the SQ is better than Godfathers &#039;In The Light Of Landover&#039;, but if it is an upgrade, why only half a show?

Great to see yet more Sabbath titles - Shades are starting to come good again aftet many interesting releases were relegated to CDRs, and No Label has yet to put a foot wrong, IMO.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like DLee, I am puzzled by the Sigma one disc Landover. I presume (well, hope!) the SQ is better than Godfathers &#8216;In The Light Of Landover&#8217;, but if it is an upgrade, why only half a show?</p>
<p>Great to see yet more Sabbath titles &#8211; Shades are starting to come good again aftet many interesting releases were relegated to CDRs, and No Label has yet to put a foot wrong, IMO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gsparaco</title>
		<link>http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/announcements/new-releases-49/comment-page-1/#comment-8463</link>
		<dc:creator>gsparaco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 21:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/?p=12129#comment-8463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, the Rolling Stones is on the &quot;no label&quot; label.  Speaking of the Stones, where has DAC gone?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the Rolling Stones is on the &#8220;no label&#8221; label.  Speaking of the Stones, where has DAC gone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lordbud</title>
		<link>http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/announcements/new-releases-49/comment-page-1/#comment-8462</link>
		<dc:creator>Lordbud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 21:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/?p=12129#comment-8462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[February 18th the first gen tape of the June 4, 1976 Paris performance was posted on a well known tracker. It is an excellent audie with Keith Richards guitar quite audible all the way through. Except during Brown Sugar. Otherwise a truly enjoyable 1976 Rolling Stones audie. Hopefully this a No Label label CD set.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>February 18th the first gen tape of the June 4, 1976 Paris performance was posted on a well known tracker. It is an excellent audie with Keith Richards guitar quite audible all the way through. Except during Brown Sugar. Otherwise a truly enjoyable 1976 Rolling Stones audie. Hopefully this a No Label label CD set.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DLee</title>
		<link>http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/announcements/new-releases-49/comment-page-1/#comment-8458</link>
		<dc:creator>DLee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 04:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/?p=12129#comment-8458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sigma releasing just a 1-disc title, which they&#039;ve described as having &quot;TRULY AMAZING/PERFECT SOUND&quot;, is somewhat surprising since they seem to have a preference of their releases having at least 2 discs - in fact, all of their releases have been at least 2 discs, w/ the notable exception of their very first title, which was &quot;BBC Archives 1974&quot; (Sigma 1).  &quot;An Hour With Pink Floyd&quot; (Sigma 26) can&#039;t actually be considered another exception since it includes a DVD disc coupled w/ its CD.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sigma releasing just a 1-disc title, which they&#8217;ve described as having &#8220;TRULY AMAZING/PERFECT SOUND&#8221;, is somewhat surprising since they seem to have a preference of their releases having at least 2 discs &#8211; in fact, all of their releases have been at least 2 discs, w/ the notable exception of their very first title, which was &#8220;BBC Archives 1974&#8243; (Sigma 1).  &#8220;An Hour With Pink Floyd&#8221; (Sigma 26) can&#8217;t actually be considered another exception since it includes a DVD disc coupled w/ its CD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
