<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Beatles &#8211; A-Cam + B-Cam : Stereo at Twickenham, Jan 3rd 1969 (Yellow Dog Records YD 079 &#8211; 2002)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/beatles/beatles-a-cam-b-cam-stereo-at-twickenham-jan-3rd-1969-yellow-dog-records-yd-079-2002/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/beatles/beatles-a-cam-b-cam-stereo-at-twickenham-jan-3rd-1969-yellow-dog-records-yd-079-2002/</link>
	<description>The Standard In Live Release Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 07:13:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: walterfive</title>
		<link>http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/beatles/beatles-a-cam-b-cam-stereo-at-twickenham-jan-3rd-1969-yellow-dog-records-yd-079-2002/comment-page-1/#comment-3969</link>
		<dc:creator>walterfive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 19:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/beatles/beatles-a-cam-b-cam-stereo-at-twickenham-jan-3rd-1969-yellow-dog-records-yd-079-2002/#comment-3969</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Separate mono tracks synched to make two-track recordings do not equate to &quot;stereo&quot;. But they&#039;re better than poke in the eye with a stick. Perhaps a bit more disappointing than some cherry-picked Get Back/Let It Be collections, but certainly better than several other collections I could name.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Separate mono tracks synched to make two-track recordings do not equate to &#8220;stereo&#8221;. But they&#8217;re better than poke in the eye with a stick. Perhaps a bit more disappointing than some cherry-picked Get Back/Let It Be collections, but certainly better than several other collections I could name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
