Comments on: Led Zeppelin – Destroyer (Eelgrass EGL-20226/27/28) http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/led-zeppelin/led-zeppelin-destroyer-eelgrass-egl-202262728/ The Standard In Live Release Analysis Fri, 24 May 2013 20:37:33 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: strummerville http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/led-zeppelin/led-zeppelin-destroyer-eelgrass-egl-202262728/comment-page-1/#comment-4687 strummerville Fri, 23 Apr 2010 17:33:49 +0000 http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/led-zeppelin/led-zeppelin-destroyer-eelgrass-egl-202262728/#comment-4687 The Bootledz site says that the Eelgrass is an amplified mixture of the EV and the no label, so I’m guessing you’re right, thanks for the info Axeman.

]]> By: Careful Axeman Eugene http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/led-zeppelin/led-zeppelin-destroyer-eelgrass-egl-202262728/comment-page-1/#comment-4685 Careful Axeman Eugene Fri, 23 Apr 2010 03:27:42 +0000 http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/led-zeppelin/led-zeppelin-destroyer-eelgrass-egl-202262728/#comment-4685 it must be the no label. if you refer to the review for that one, you’ll even see that i commented about how outrageously low the volume is for the no-label release, which should have been much much louder.

]]> By: strummerville http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/led-zeppelin/led-zeppelin-destroyer-eelgrass-egl-202262728/comment-page-1/#comment-4671 strummerville Wed, 21 Apr 2010 19:19:36 +0000 http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/led-zeppelin/led-zeppelin-destroyer-eelgrass-egl-202262728/#comment-4671 “The only concern is that the volume could have been higher, and that is precisely the difference between that release and this one”.

Which could have been louder, the Eelgrass or the “no label”…?

]]>