<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Led Zeppelin &#8211; Live In Charlotte 1972 (no label)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/led-zeppelin/led-zeppelin-live-in-charlotte-1972-no-label/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/led-zeppelin/led-zeppelin-live-in-charlotte-1972-no-label/</link>
	<description>The Standard In Live Release Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 07:12:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: porgie</title>
		<link>http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/led-zeppelin/led-zeppelin-live-in-charlotte-1972-no-label/comment-page-1/#comment-4108</link>
		<dc:creator>porgie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 16:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/led-zeppelin/led-zeppelin-live-in-charlotte-1972-no-label/#comment-4108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Usually a half step in either direction is pretty annoying to me. I personally think the labels should take the slight effort to pitch correct as close as possible given the expensive prices they command. It&#039;s not hard to do at all, if the person mastering has decent ears.  Thanks for all your excellent reviews, much appreciated.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Usually a half step in either direction is pretty annoying to me. I personally think the labels should take the slight effort to pitch correct as close as possible given the expensive prices they command. It&#8217;s not hard to do at all, if the person mastering has decent ears.  Thanks for all your excellent reviews, much appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gsparaco</title>
		<link>http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/led-zeppelin/led-zeppelin-live-in-charlotte-1972-no-label/comment-page-1/#comment-4107</link>
		<dc:creator>gsparaco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 13:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/led-zeppelin/led-zeppelin-live-in-charlotte-1972-no-label/#comment-4107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Half a step flat isn&#039;t a huge deal although is probably noticable to some people.  They sound correct to me.  No label have been very good in mastering tapes at the correct pitch.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Half a step flat isn&#8217;t a huge deal although is probably noticable to some people.  They sound correct to me.  No label have been very good in mastering tapes at the correct pitch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: porgie</title>
		<link>http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/led-zeppelin/led-zeppelin-live-in-charlotte-1972-no-label/comment-page-1/#comment-4105</link>
		<dc:creator>porgie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 06:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/led-zeppelin/led-zeppelin-live-in-charlotte-1972-no-label/#comment-4105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TDOLZ does not run at correct pitch, it is nearly a half step flat. I don&#039;t have other titles to compare but if they run faster then they are most likely at proper pitch. Bootledz also makes this erroneous claim about the TDOLZ version. It&#039;s definitely slow so I hope this one is not.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TDOLZ does not run at correct pitch, it is nearly a half step flat. I don&#8217;t have other titles to compare but if they run faster then they are most likely at proper pitch. Bootledz also makes this erroneous claim about the TDOLZ version. It&#8217;s definitely slow so I hope this one is not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
