<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Led Zeppelin &#8211; Stoke 1973 (no label)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/led-zeppelin/led-zeppelin-stoke-1973-no-label/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/led-zeppelin/led-zeppelin-stoke-1973-no-label/</link>
	<description>The Standard In Live Release Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 06:12:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: LedMan</title>
		<link>http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/led-zeppelin/led-zeppelin-stoke-1973-no-label/comment-page-1/#comment-6224</link>
		<dc:creator>LedMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 09:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/led-zeppelin/led-zeppelin-stoke-1973-no-label/#comment-6224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This soundboard source has come a long way since it was first pressed on discs. One of the first titles I bought was &quot;Broken Fingers&quot; from the Image Quality label. That tape source was damaged and therefore a very tough listen for my ears. I agree that &quot;IQ&quot; put out some great releases however this was not one of them.

I thought Live At Trentham Gardens (Empress Valley EVSD-394/395)  had a little too much background noise and bass.
This release doesn&#039;t suffer from the same problems that the Image Quality does.

Listening to the release reviewed above, I think it has a warmer, smoother sound compared to most of the previous releases. Very enjoyable for me to listen to and a surprise since I expected it to sound the same compared to the most recent releases.

I seem to remember that recently a Zeppelin fan torrented what they claimed was the best sounding soundboard source and suspect this release originated from that torrent. That doesn&#039;t bother me the least bit since this site focuses mostly on silver pressed releases and I would rather have the best sounding version on silvers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This soundboard source has come a long way since it was first pressed on discs. One of the first titles I bought was &#8220;Broken Fingers&#8221; from the Image Quality label. That tape source was damaged and therefore a very tough listen for my ears. I agree that &#8220;IQ&#8221; put out some great releases however this was not one of them.</p>
<p>I thought Live At Trentham Gardens (Empress Valley EVSD-394/395)  had a little too much background noise and bass.<br />
This release doesn&#8217;t suffer from the same problems that the Image Quality does.</p>
<p>Listening to the release reviewed above, I think it has a warmer, smoother sound compared to most of the previous releases. Very enjoyable for me to listen to and a surprise since I expected it to sound the same compared to the most recent releases.</p>
<p>I seem to remember that recently a Zeppelin fan torrented what they claimed was the best sounding soundboard source and suspect this release originated from that torrent. That doesn&#8217;t bother me the least bit since this site focuses mostly on silver pressed releases and I would rather have the best sounding version on silvers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
