<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Led Zeppelin &#8211; Texas Blues (Godfather Records GR400)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/led-zeppelin/led-zeppelin-texas-blues-godfather-records-gr400/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/led-zeppelin/led-zeppelin-texas-blues-godfather-records-gr400/</link>
	<description>The Standard In Live Release Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 00:59:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: chambau</title>
		<link>http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/led-zeppelin/led-zeppelin-texas-blues-godfather-records-gr400/comment-page-1/#comment-3831</link>
		<dc:creator>chambau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 19:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/led-zeppelin/led-zeppelin-texas-blues-godfather-records-gr400/#comment-3831</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After reading the review above, I was a bit hesitant to order this title. Previously I had only a CD-R copy of the Oh Boy release that I don&#039;t like that much. About a month ago a friend of mine e-mailed me offering his spare (and unplayed) copy for only $10. Yes, only $10 bucks and I decided to take my chances. All I can say is that I&#039;m really impressed and pleased. Even with the diginoising, which I don&#039;t find intrusive, this title is awesome. the sound is clear and vivid. Highly recommended!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After reading the review above, I was a bit hesitant to order this title. Previously I had only a CD-R copy of the Oh Boy release that I don&#8217;t like that much. About a month ago a friend of mine e-mailed me offering his spare (and unplayed) copy for only $10. Yes, only $10 bucks and I decided to take my chances. All I can say is that I&#8217;m really impressed and pleased. Even with the diginoising, which I don&#8217;t find intrusive, this title is awesome. the sound is clear and vivid. Highly recommended!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chambau</title>
		<link>http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/led-zeppelin/led-zeppelin-texas-blues-godfather-records-gr400/comment-page-1/#comment-3659</link>
		<dc:creator>chambau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/led-zeppelin/led-zeppelin-texas-blues-godfather-records-gr400/#comment-3659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does anyone know whether Godfather plans to fix the clicks by re-releasing it?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone know whether Godfather plans to fix the clicks by re-releasing it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jona</title>
		<link>http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/led-zeppelin/led-zeppelin-texas-blues-godfather-records-gr400/comment-page-1/#comment-3505</link>
		<dc:creator>Jona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 20:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/led-zeppelin/led-zeppelin-texas-blues-godfather-records-gr400/#comment-3505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have the EV DVD-A release of this show. Is this release worth the upgrade?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have the EV DVD-A release of this show. Is this release worth the upgrade?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Argenteum Astrum</title>
		<link>http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/led-zeppelin/led-zeppelin-texas-blues-godfather-records-gr400/comment-page-1/#comment-3170</link>
		<dc:creator>Argenteum Astrum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 08:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/led-zeppelin/led-zeppelin-texas-blues-godfather-records-gr400/#comment-3170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After listening I can say that these clicks are not so annoying so I recommended highly this release over past editions of this remarkable show.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After listening I can say that these clicks are not so annoying so I recommended highly this release over past editions of this remarkable show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: strummerville</title>
		<link>http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/led-zeppelin/led-zeppelin-texas-blues-godfather-records-gr400/comment-page-1/#comment-2893</link>
		<dc:creator>strummerville</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 10:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/led-zeppelin/led-zeppelin-texas-blues-godfather-records-gr400/#comment-2893</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the review. I was on the brink of ordering this disc until I read about the digital noise problems. Such a shame - I REALLY hope this gets corrected in the same way that Pink Floyd&#039;s &quot;Echoes, Wishes and Desires&quot; did.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the review. I was on the brink of ordering this disc until I read about the digital noise problems. Such a shame &#8211; I REALLY hope this gets corrected in the same way that Pink Floyd&#8217;s &#8220;Echoes, Wishes and Desires&#8221; did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: astroidbelt</title>
		<link>http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/led-zeppelin/led-zeppelin-texas-blues-godfather-records-gr400/comment-page-1/#comment-2884</link>
		<dc:creator>astroidbelt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 19:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/led-zeppelin/led-zeppelin-texas-blues-godfather-records-gr400/#comment-2884</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Uh, I can see how people are still up in the air about the 1971 Osaka tape being a soundboard or audience recording, but this 69 Texas recording has always been known as being a soundboard, hasn&#039;t it?

I mean, how much more &quot;soundboard&quot; can it get? So, I&#039;m just curious as to how one could possibly think was an audience recording.

Otherwise, thanks for the review!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh, I can see how people are still up in the air about the 1971 Osaka tape being a soundboard or audience recording, but this 69 Texas recording has always been known as being a soundboard, hasn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>I mean, how much more &#8220;soundboard&#8221; can it get? So, I&#8217;m just curious as to how one could possibly think was an audience recording.</p>
<p>Otherwise, thanks for the review!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: langbroek</title>
		<link>http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/led-zeppelin/led-zeppelin-texas-blues-godfather-records-gr400/comment-page-1/#comment-2881</link>
		<dc:creator>langbroek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 08:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/led-zeppelin/led-zeppelin-texas-blues-godfather-records-gr400/#comment-2881</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like this one more then oh boy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like this one more then oh boy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LedMan</title>
		<link>http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/led-zeppelin/led-zeppelin-texas-blues-godfather-records-gr400/comment-page-1/#comment-2880</link>
		<dc:creator>LedMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 03:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/led-zeppelin/led-zeppelin-texas-blues-godfather-records-gr400/#comment-2880</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I also agree this is clearer and personally like the edits between the two sources used. Maybe Godfather will see these comments and consider another try at this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also agree this is clearer and personally like the edits between the two sources used. Maybe Godfather will see these comments and consider another try at this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
