Comments on: Led Zeppelin – The Destroyer (The Diagrams Of Led Zeppelin TDOLZ Vol.17R) http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/led-zeppelin/led-zeppelin-the-destroyer-the-diagrams-of-led-zeppelin-tdolz-vol17r/ The Standard In Live Release Analysis Mon, 20 May 2013 22:54:30 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: gsparaco http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/led-zeppelin/led-zeppelin-the-destroyer-the-diagrams-of-led-zeppelin-tdolz-vol17r/comment-page-1/#comment-1294 gsparaco Mon, 17 Nov 2008 21:29:36 +0000 http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/led-zeppelin/led-zeppelin-the-destroyer-the-diagrams-of-led-zeppelin-tdolz-vol17r/#comment-1294 There was an LP Destroyer with the soundboard recording of the previous night.

]]> By: walterfive http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/led-zeppelin/led-zeppelin-the-destroyer-the-diagrams-of-led-zeppelin-tdolz-vol17r/comment-page-1/#comment-1176 walterfive Mon, 03 Nov 2008 20:12:28 +0000 http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/led-zeppelin/led-zeppelin-the-destroyer-the-diagrams-of-led-zeppelin-tdolz-vol17r/#comment-1176 Oh, you forgot to mention that the 2nd Edition also comes with a mini-poster of the Frazetta illustration.

]]> By: walterfive http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/led-zeppelin/led-zeppelin-the-destroyer-the-diagrams-of-led-zeppelin-tdolz-vol17r/comment-page-1/#comment-1175 walterfive Mon, 03 Nov 2008 20:08:44 +0000 http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/led-zeppelin/led-zeppelin-the-destroyer-the-diagrams-of-led-zeppelin-tdolz-vol17r/#comment-1175 Just found this at my local used LP shop, along with a dozen other titles, the packaging was quite nice, and the sound is as good as one can reasonably expect. The performance *is* amazing, I can see why people thought this was one of the best (if not *the* best) shows for this tour (if not for this year)!

But this is not the same performance as the original “Destroyer” bootleg LP, to my ears, although I’ll admit that it’s been at least two decades since I heard the original 2-LP set, and my reccollection might be foggy… can anyone verify?

]]>