<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pink Floyd &#8211; Bradford 1971 (Sigma 35)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/pink-floyd/pink-floyd-bradford-1971-sigma-35/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/pink-floyd/pink-floyd-bradford-1971-sigma-35/</link>
	<description>The Standard In Live Release Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 08:27:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: LedMan</title>
		<link>http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/pink-floyd/pink-floyd-bradford-1971-sigma-35/comment-page-1/#comment-3353</link>
		<dc:creator>LedMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 02:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/pink-floyd/pink-floyd-bradford-1971-sigma-35/#comment-3353</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not sure which one I like better. &quot;Bradford 1971&quot; sounds a little harsh to my ears although maybe it will grow on me after repeated listening.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure which one I like better. &#8220;Bradford 1971&#8243; sounds a little harsh to my ears although maybe it will grow on me after repeated listening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DLee</title>
		<link>http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/pink-floyd/pink-floyd-bradford-1971-sigma-35/comment-page-1/#comment-2130</link>
		<dc:creator>DLee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/pink-floyd/pink-floyd-bradford-1971-sigma-35/#comment-2130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At least the front cover is a major upgrade over that ass-ugly one of Gold Standard&#039;s &quot;Amazing Yorkshire Pudding&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least the front cover is a major upgrade over that ass-ugly one of Gold Standard&#8217;s &#8220;Amazing Yorkshire Pudding&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DLee</title>
		<link>http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/pink-floyd/pink-floyd-bradford-1971-sigma-35/comment-page-1/#comment-2063</link>
		<dc:creator>DLee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 05:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/pink-floyd/pink-floyd-bradford-1971-sigma-35/#comment-2063</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I decided not to get this particular one since Gold Standard&#039;s &quot;Amazing Yorkshire Pudding&quot; and the Ayanami 2-pro-CD-R version &quot;Bradford 1971&quot; are fairly nice already, but the comparison to &#039;em should be at least slightly helpful to someone.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I decided not to get this particular one since Gold Standard&#8217;s &#8220;Amazing Yorkshire Pudding&#8221; and the Ayanami 2-pro-CD-R version &#8220;Bradford 1971&#8243; are fairly nice already, but the comparison to &#8216;em should be at least slightly helpful to someone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
