<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pink Floyd &#8211; Definitive Oakland (Sigma 37)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/pink-floyd/pink-floyd-definitive-oakland-sigma-37/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/pink-floyd/pink-floyd-definitive-oakland-sigma-37/</link>
	<description>The Standard In Live Release Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:12:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: aleebee</title>
		<link>http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/pink-floyd/pink-floyd-definitive-oakland-sigma-37/comment-page-1/#comment-2438</link>
		<dc:creator>aleebee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 04:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/pink-floyd/pink-floyd-definitive-oakland-sigma-37/#comment-2438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have tonight finally got around to comparing all five versions of this show that I have. Now, I preferred &#039;Mr Pig&#039; (Highland Prime Masters) to &#039;Oakland&#039; (Sigma 2), the former having more life to it, IMO. However, it was marred by the two edits. When I read of &#039;Definitve Oakland&#039; I decided to take the chance and add it to my collection. To these ears, it definitely has more life to it than &#039;Oakland&#039; and I even prefer it to &#039;Mr Pig&#039;, which is good as Sigma releases are not cheap, as well we know! So, my own rankings are &#039;Definitive Oakland&#039; (Sigma) &gt; &#039;Mr Pig&#039; (Highland PM) &gt; &#039;Oakland&#039; (Sigma) &gt; &#039;Welcome To The Machine&#039; (Cannonball) &gt; In The Flesh (Great Dane). I do not own the Sirene set and now have no intention of getting it. Indeed, I can now relegate the lesser editions in order to thin out my collection.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have tonight finally got around to comparing all five versions of this show that I have. Now, I preferred &#8216;Mr Pig&#8217; (Highland Prime Masters) to &#8216;Oakland&#8217; (Sigma 2), the former having more life to it, IMO. However, it was marred by the two edits. When I read of &#8216;Definitve Oakland&#8217; I decided to take the chance and add it to my collection. To these ears, it definitely has more life to it than &#8216;Oakland&#8217; and I even prefer it to &#8216;Mr Pig&#8217;, which is good as Sigma releases are not cheap, as well we know! So, my own rankings are &#8216;Definitive Oakland&#8217; (Sigma) &gt; &#8216;Mr Pig&#8217; (Highland PM) &gt; &#8216;Oakland&#8217; (Sigma) &gt; &#8216;Welcome To The Machine&#8217; (Cannonball) &gt; In The Flesh (Great Dane). I do not own the Sirene set and now have no intention of getting it. Indeed, I can now relegate the lesser editions in order to thin out my collection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DLee</title>
		<link>http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/pink-floyd/pink-floyd-definitive-oakland-sigma-37/comment-page-1/#comment-2226</link>
		<dc:creator>DLee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 04:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/pink-floyd/pink-floyd-definitive-oakland-sigma-37/#comment-2226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As for the non-commercial &quot;Animal Instincts&quot; release, never have heard it, but from what I&#039;ve read/heard about it, it&#039;s probably only a slight upgrade of Discurios&#039; old &quot;Plays the Animals&quot;, which was thought to be great at the time it was popular after its release, but now gets blown away by the latest versions - esp. Sigma&#039;s &quot;Definitive Oakland&quot;.  Sigma 37 beats the hell out of &quot;Plays the Animals&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As for the non-commercial &#8220;Animal Instincts&#8221; release, never have heard it, but from what I&#8217;ve read/heard about it, it&#8217;s probably only a slight upgrade of Discurios&#8217; old &#8220;Plays the Animals&#8221;, which was thought to be great at the time it was popular after its release, but now gets blown away by the latest versions &#8211; esp. Sigma&#8217;s &#8220;Definitive Oakland&#8221;.  Sigma 37 beats the hell out of &#8220;Plays the Animals&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jona</title>
		<link>http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/pink-floyd/pink-floyd-definitive-oakland-sigma-37/comment-page-1/#comment-2224</link>
		<dc:creator>Jona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 21:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/pink-floyd/pink-floyd-definitive-oakland-sigma-37/#comment-2224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does anyone know how the sound quality of this compares to the Harvested CD-R release of this show called &quot;Animal Instincts&quot;?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone know how the sound quality of this compares to the Harvested CD-R release of this show called &#8220;Animal Instincts&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DLee</title>
		<link>http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/pink-floyd/pink-floyd-definitive-oakland-sigma-37/comment-page-1/#comment-2215</link>
		<dc:creator>DLee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 03:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/pink-floyd/pink-floyd-definitive-oakland-sigma-37/#comment-2215</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to what I know, mostly from what&#039;s been said here in the past, the only part of the recording that comes from that particular source, if any at all, are the 2 bits that must have been used to fill in the couple gaps relating to the pair of tape flips.  Otherwise, it&#039;s highly improbable that Wolfgang&#039;s Vault was used.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to what I know, mostly from what&#8217;s been said here in the past, the only part of the recording that comes from that particular source, if any at all, are the 2 bits that must have been used to fill in the couple gaps relating to the pair of tape flips.  Otherwise, it&#8217;s highly improbable that Wolfgang&#8217;s Vault was used.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Plomerus</title>
		<link>http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/pink-floyd/pink-floyd-definitive-oakland-sigma-37/comment-page-1/#comment-2213</link>
		<dc:creator>Plomerus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 18:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/pink-floyd/pink-floyd-definitive-oakland-sigma-37/#comment-2213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I concur...Sigma 37 is indeed the definitive version of this excellent recording...surpassing all prior releases. Amazing sound quality and mastering. I will be updating the &quot;Essential Floyd&quot; article accordingly. Don&#039;t hesitate if you&#039;re on the fence about this one!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I concur&#8230;Sigma 37 is indeed the definitive version of this excellent recording&#8230;surpassing all prior releases. Amazing sound quality and mastering. I will be updating the &#8220;Essential Floyd&#8221; article accordingly. Don&#8217;t hesitate if you&#8217;re on the fence about this one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vigotone</title>
		<link>http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/pink-floyd/pink-floyd-definitive-oakland-sigma-37/comment-page-1/#comment-2209</link>
		<dc:creator>vigotone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 17:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/pink-floyd/pink-floyd-definitive-oakland-sigma-37/#comment-2209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I highly doubt it, Chambau, as WV only has Pigs (Three DIfferent Ones) through Us and Them in their archives.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I highly doubt it, Chambau, as WV only has Pigs (Three DIfferent Ones) through Us and Them in their archives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chambau</title>
		<link>http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/pink-floyd/pink-floyd-definitive-oakland-sigma-37/comment-page-1/#comment-2207</link>
		<dc:creator>chambau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 16:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/pink-floyd/pink-floyd-definitive-oakland-sigma-37/#comment-2207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DLee: It looks like we have a winner here. I was told this release is probably sourced from Wolfgang&#039;s Vault (MP3). Any comments?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DLee: It looks like we have a winner here. I was told this release is probably sourced from Wolfgang&#8217;s Vault (MP3). Any comments?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
