http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/rolling-stones/rolling-stones-hold-on-tight-dog-n-cat-dac-083/ The Standard In Live Release Analysis Tue, 18 Jun 2013 07:12:42 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/rolling-stones/rolling-stones-hold-on-tight-dog-n-cat-dac-083/comment-page-1/#comment-3069 dannyzero Fri, 28 Aug 2009 18:52:05 +0000 http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/rolling-stones/rolling-stones-hold-on-tight-dog-n-cat-dac-083/#comment-3069 I know sound quality on these releases is very subjective, but the DAC version of this show, to my ears, sounds much superior and better than the no label “The Original Hold on Tight”. Much like many SODD and Godfather titles, the no label version has been “brightened” on the higher end and sounds very tinny and bad to me. This DAC release sounds like an entirely different show, and in my opinion is the better version, as it sounds more natural and is really a great recording ; an opinion I didn’t get after listening to the no label CD.

]]> http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/rolling-stones/rolling-stones-hold-on-tight-dog-n-cat-dac-083/comment-page-1/#comment-1748 dannyzero Fri, 23 Jan 2009 22:31:47 +0000 http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/rolling-stones/rolling-stones-hold-on-tight-dog-n-cat-dac-083/#comment-1748 Does this Dog N Cat release utilize the second tape source for some of the show, as The Original Hold On Tight does (see review)? Is this version “duller” than The Original… version because that version has been tweaked on the higher end (like SODD titles)? Thanks!

]]>