Comments on: The Rolling Stones – Sucking In Detroit (Rattlesnake RS 201/202)

By: langbroek

langbroek — Wed, 01 Dec 2010 16:39:03 +0000

The tree nummers are from houston,I think so.

By: erikbt

erikbt — Wed, 01 Dec 2010 09:28:05 +0000

DAC used the Wolfgang’s vault “low bit rate” MP3 stream, and added a “high frequenzy roof of noise” to cover up the lossiness, if someone were to check it with software. This “roof” is unbearable to listen to for us with “younger” ears (no kidding), because it’s a frequenzy which people over….30 or 40 will not hear (just like the “buzzing”-sound of a TV that’s on). Hopefully Rattlesnake used the high bit-rate stream for their release, and maybe touched up the recording with EQ (Rattlesnake is good at that work). Expecting my copy to arrive within the week. Thanks for the review.

By: gsparaco

gsparaco — Tue, 30 Nov 2010 22:52:49 +0000

I found the sound quality of the Rattlesnake superior to Abandoned In Detroit. It was more loud, clear and lively sounding.

By: dannyzero

dannyzero — Tue, 30 Nov 2010 22:31:22 +0000

How does the quality of this Rattlesnake release compare with Dog N Cat’s “Abandoned in Detroit”? And are the last 3 songs (“Sweet Little Sixteen”, “Brown Sugar” and “Jumping Jack Flash”) actually from Detroit, as all other sources are taken from Houston 7-19-1978? Any help would be appreciated. Thanks! Great review!