<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Who &#8211; New York 1979 (no label)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/the-who/the-who-new-york-1979-no-label/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/the-who/the-who-new-york-1979-no-label/</link>
	<description>The Standard In Live Release Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 07:12:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: npollack</title>
		<link>http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/the-who/the-who-new-york-1979-no-label/comment-page-1/#comment-3697</link>
		<dc:creator>npollack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.collectorsmusicreviews.com/the-who/the-who-new-york-1979-no-label/#comment-3697</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just received a copy of this release and New Jersey 79. I do agree with your review and this is a must for any Who collector. I&#039;m very pleased. I thought there was information at one time this release was going to have some 76 New York on it as well but I guess not. Keep up the good work!
mecham3]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just received a copy of this release and New Jersey 79. I do agree with your review and this is a must for any Who collector. I&#8217;m very pleased. I thought there was information at one time this release was going to have some 76 New York on it as well but I guess not. Keep up the good work!<br />
mecham3</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
